Many areas have to go to unregistered techs out of necessity due to the high
vacancy rate in our field since the ASCP made changes to the career path for
the HT board requirements. Many of these facilities have either formal or
informal training and have turned out many very good, high quality techs. Yes,
some may be skilled at the "art" of histology, but lack the understanding that
is behind the science. These often can embed, cut and do special stains with
superior quality and happy pathologists. I have seen registered techs that
have all the intelligence that their sheepskins say, but totally lack the hands
on skills needed to produce superior quality material for patient diagnosis.
While this is only my opinion, I wish that there was still the route for OJT as
long as there is a certified tech in place for training.
My two cents worth,
Mary Abosso
________________________________
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of Steven Coakley
Sent: Wed 2/11/2009 7:55 AM
To: Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] uncertified techs in Histology
Any thoughts or experiences with my fellow HT/HTL's(ASCP). What the big
advantage do all these facilities think there gaining by going with
unregistered techs, especially when theres always ongoing quality issues when
theres so many trained certified HT looking for work? In my area of the
country I can't believe how many Hospitals go this way.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
