I also agree. It would be wonderful to have NSH administer the exam. The computer adaptive "written" part of the exam is excellent, and very standardized. If a national practical exam administered by NSH could take place at the summer session and fall meetings, I would be all for that.
Of course many don't need the incentive of required CE to obtain it, but it helps to promote the profession. I hope it will raise the level of perceived professionalism by medical administrators. Rosa Fields, HT (ASCP) Gastroenterology Specialties Histology Supervisor 4545 R Street Lincoln, NE 68503 402-465-4545 rfie...@gidocs.net The information contained in the message and the documents accompanying this message contain information that is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than its return to the sender, is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Victor Tobias Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:34 PM To: Rittman, Barry R Cc: Histonet Subject: Re: [Histonet] Practical Exam Barry, I agree with your statement, What is really needed is a national standardized written and practical test that is administered by NSH. Victor Tobias Clinical Applications Analyst University of Washington Medical Center Dept of Pathology Room BB220 1959 NE Pacific Seattle, WA 98195 vic...@pathology.washington.edu 206-598-2792 206-598-7659 Fax ================================================= Privileged, confidential or patient identifiable information may be contained in this message. This information is meant only for the use of the intended recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, or if the message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this transmission. Instead, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. Rittman, Barry R wrote: > Victor > I cannot believe that you have said this. > Although I did not think that the practical examination was the ultimate test > of skill , it did at least provide some uniformity. > With an extension of the logic that you use it is just as easy to allow the > pathologist to certify that the technician is qualified even without a > written examination. > Without a somewhat standardized practical there is no guarantee that the > technician will have any practical knowledge outside their individual > laboratory. > Didactic without adequate practical knowledge is, as far as I am concerned, > useless. > What is really needed is a national standardized written and practical test > that is administered by NSH. > I am not holding my breath that this will happen. > Barry > > ________________________________________ > From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu > [histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Victor Tobias > [vic...@pathology.washington.edu] > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:03 PM > To: Histonet > Subject: [Histonet] Practical Exam > > There has been discussion regarding the removal of the practical exam. > To me it has not been removed, but the responsibility has shifted to > whomever signs off on the student. In the case of OJT, the pathologist > has verified that this student can cut and stain. Of course what is > acceptable to one pathologist may not be to another. Do they get tested > in the art of troubleshooting...... As far as the schools go, they > shouldn't be graduating anyone that can't cut, stain and troubleshoot. > So I don't really see a problem with the absence of the practical. It is > Friday somewhere. > > Victor > > -- > Victor Tobias > Clinical Applications Analyst > University of Washington Medical Center > Dept of Pathology Room BB220 > 1959 NE Pacific > Seattle, WA 98195 > vic...@pathology.washington.edu > 206-598-2792 > 206-598-7659 Fax > ================================================= > Privileged, confidential or patient identifiable information may be > contained in this message. This information is meant only for the use > of the intended recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, or > if the message has been addressed to you in error, do not read, > disclose, reproduce, distribute, disseminate or otherwise use this > transmission. Instead, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and > then destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. > > > _______________________________________________ > Histonet mailing list > Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet