Kim wrote: "Seems the actual amount of validation slides can vary with 
different Medical directors( Pathologist)"

Yes, validation is simply the process of proving to yourself and anyone else 
(pathologist, clinician, inspector,  patient, lawyer) that the product works as 
intended. Medical Directors are responsible for determining what that entails, 
whether large or small sets of tissue. There are certain recommendations that 
have been written up but it all comes down to being able to convince anyone who 
looks into it that everything is well done.

CLIA regulations outline the process and following it will ensure you are on 
the right track.

I have some documents up on a Yahoo groups page that anyone can download. They 
are from a validation presentation at NSH and ASCP meetings, including the 
presentation powerpoint outling CLIA and CAP requirements, model validation 
procedure and model validation documentation forms. You have to join the group 
but it is free and I promis there will be no emailings to bug you.

Go to Yahool groups and search for "Histoinfo" group

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, IPOX
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, CA, USA
________________________________
From: Kim Donadio [mailto:one_angel_sec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:42 PM
To: Morken, Timothy; 'Amber McKenzie'; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] RE: Validation

Seems the actual amount of validation slides can vary with different Medical 
directors( Pathologist) or thats what Ive seen in places. They( The 
Pathologist) sign off on it. With that said ER/PR and Her2 have more vigorous 
criteria( very specific, such as the 25-50). Also, the 2011 AP133 guidline is 
suppose to go into more detail on this. I havnt seen that new recomendation 
yet. So If anyone has it, would love to see it posted here myself?

Thanks

Kim

From: "Morken, Timothy" <timothy.mor...@ucsfmedctr.org>
To: 'Amber McKenzie' <amber.mcken...@gastrodocs.net>; 
"histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu" <histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 2:08 PM
Subject: [Histonet] RE: Validation

Amber, is this new instrument the same kind as your old instrument and are you 
using the same reagents? Or is it a totally different platform with different 
reagents?

Putting in a new instrument of the same kind and using the same reagents just 
requires verifying the new instrument works. You have to convince whoever wants 
to know that it works the same as the older instrument so running a variety of 
antibodies and procedures on it will suffice to prove that. Doing 
reproducibility tests also proves the instrument works as intended - 5 to 10 
identical slides on one run, 5 to 10 identical slides on 5 to 10 runs.

If it is a totally different platform with different reagents then you are in 
for revalidating each of your antibodies on the new system.

Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, IPOX
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, CA, USA

-----Original Message-----
From: 
histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>]
 On Behalf Of Amber McKenzie
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 10:21 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] Validation


Just wondering what y'alls opinion is on validation:  I don't really understand 
why optimization isn't enough.  At that point, the pathologist has said what he 
wanted the stain to look like, so why do 3-10 positive slides on the new 
instrument to compare to previous slides from another instrument?  Thanks!

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu<mailto:Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to