My current QA monitors
 

Not more than 0.17% slides mislabeledNot
more than 1.0% of tissue blocks-reoriented ( embedding errors)Not more than 
1.0% of tissue blocks reprocessed ( gross problem)Not
more than 1% of specials and IHC stain slides repeated ( technical issues-not 
DX)Not
more than 0.1% of slides, with documented evidence of cross contamination, 
requires RCA Based mostly on CAP- HQUIP, but some literature. Use LIS and HC1 
to track in addition to manual methods for reporting, repeats etc. The medical 
director (pathologist) supervises , provides oversight for the quality issues 
and resulting corrective actions. 







Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
 
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:32:56 +0000
> CC: 
> Subject: [Histonet] RE: error rate for sectioning
> 
> Hi Patricia,
> 
> Error rates should not be set by employers. You should have an effective QA 
> management program and committee even in small practices with the Medical 
> Director as the Chair. The committee sets and establishes error rate 
> thresholds with monthly monitors in place to seek opportunities of 
> improvement should error rates exceed below the set threshold. 
> 
> Hope this helps!
> 
> Michael
>  
> Michael R. LaFriniere, HT (ASCP) 
> Executive Director
> 
>  
> Capital Choice Pathology Laboratory
> 
> 12041 Bournefield Way, Suite A * Silver Spring, MD 20904  
> 
> P: 240.471.3427 * F: 240.471.3401 * Cell 410-940-8844
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zerfas, 
> Patricia (NIH/OD/ORS) [E]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 4:25 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Histonet] error rate for sectioning
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> What is the error rate set by you or your employer for paraffin sectioning?  
> 
> These are slides that are found to be unacceptable due to wrinkling, folding 
> etc either by a pathologist or another reviewer.
> 
> I was found to have 6 slides out of approx 1500 that I have sectioned to date 
> to be unacceptable.  I only perform this duty when I have completed all of my 
> other work so this is not one of my regular duties.   At times I have gone 
> several months without sectioning and utilize a microtome that is approx. 26 
> years old.
> 
> Since this was brought to my attention I have been given more up to date 
> equipment which I have yet to utilize.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your feedback.
> 
> Patricia Zerfas
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Histonet mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
                                          
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to