Wow, that's a lot of unstained! We only cut unstained if requested and we don't 
cut anything like that for standing protocols. The most we have is 3-5 
unstained slides for a the breast protocols and 2 on some liver protocols.  The 
most extensive is Hirschprung's protocol that goes up to 26 slides on a second 
round, alternating H&E and unstained. 

A few years ago we brought up to our medical director that we had thousands of 
unstained slides sitting in files so investigated and revamped things. It had 
been a long-standing practice to always cut 2 extra unstained on ANY immuno 
order "just in case." But that was largely due to very long TAT on IHC 
staining. Now we have it down to 6-18 hours TAT so if there is a need for more 
stains they just order more and we cut them as needed. 

And now we have barcoded slides, including unstained, so they can see in the 
system exactly how many unstained are left on a particular block. And they can 
order a stain on the exact unstained slide they want. That alleviates concern 
that we don't have unstained, or they can't be found. We keep all but FISH and 
PCR unstained slides in the histo lab. 

Might this excessive unstained ordering be due to concern about cutting away 
tissue on initial cutting and recuts? Or is it TAT? Get to the root cause of 
this and you will find some things to work on in the lab that could alleviate 
it.


Tim Morken
Supervisor, Histology, Electron Microscopy and Neuromuscular Special Studies
UC San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, CA


-----Original Message-----
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu 
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Ortiz, Debra
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 10:57 AM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: [Histonet] protocols

Good afternoon everyone,

We are currently looking at or protocols for microtomy.  Currently we cut 22 
unstained slides for all lung bxs, 10 unstained for all other FNAs, and 6 
unstained for liver bxs.
Can anyone share their current microtomy protocols? The pathologists are 
willing to take a look at some change, just would like to know what other 
institutions are doing?

Thanks
Debi
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail 
(or the person responsible for delivering this document to the intended 
recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, 
printing or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly 
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please respond to the 
individual sending the message and permanently delete the original and any copy 
of any e-mail and any printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet


_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to