I would check the level of the formalin after it has been pumped into the 
retort.

I will wait till the pics are posted

Regards,

Tony Henwood MSc, BAppSc, GradDipSysAnalys, CT(ASC), FFSc(RCPA) (Retired)
Principal Scientist, the Children’s Hospital at Westmead (Retired)
Adjunct Fellow, School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney.

________________________________
From: Verizon wireless via Histonet <histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Sent: Saturday, February 3, 2024 2:36:42 PM
To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu <histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu>
Subject: [Histonet] Processing artifact - delayed start

Dear Histonet Members,

We have terrible processing artifact if tissue sits in the formalin-filled 
retort (at ambient temperature) for too long (more than 10-12 hours) before a 
delayed process starts. The longer the wait, the worse it looks. We have Tissue 
Tek VIP 5 processors, and we process luminal gastrointestinal biopsies 
exclusively. I've attached some photomicrographs of problem cases on the 
Histonet Images website (with the same topic title).
This artifact typically affects a few specimens per day (~2% or less), even 
though everything is done on the same processor; it may affect all tissue 
portions in a cassette or only some of the tissue in that cassette. Some tissue 
portions may only have the artifact on one half with the other half looking 
perfectly fine. The techs sometimes note the tissue feeling "crunchy" at the 
time of embedding and / or at the time of microtomy. These tissues tend to 
suffer greater chatter artifact and have trouble sticking to the slides. The 
sections look just as bad on recuts as the originals. Re-processing does not 
seem to help at all.
If the cassettes sit in formalin in a container outside of the processor for 
days before the processor is loaded (with subsequent immediate start), things 
look perfectly fine. When we have staff around to start the processor 
immediately upon loading cassettes and empty immediately upon completion, the 
tissue looks perfectly fine.

Our current processing program is as follows:

1. 10% Formalin, 30 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on
2. 10% Formalin, 30 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on
3. 65% Alcohol, 10 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on4. 80% Alcohol, 10 minutes, 
ambient temp, p/v on5. 95% Alcohol, 7 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on6. 95% 
Alcohol, 7 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on 7. 100% Alcohol, 10 minutes, ambient 
temp, p/v on
8. 100% Alcohol, 10 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on
9. Xylene, 15 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on
10. Xylene, 15 minutes, ambient temp, p/v on
11. Paraffin, 10 minutes, 60 degrees C, p/v on12. Paraffin, 10 minutes, 60 
degrees C, p/v on13. Paraffin, 15 minutes, 60 degrees C, p/v on14. Paraffin, 15 
minutes, 60 degrees C, p/v on

Obviously there are times we absolutely need to use delayed start. I would 
greatly appreciate guidance, and I'll be happy to provide any other details 
that might be useful.
Sincerely,
Brian Quigley MDLaboratory Director of a GI Pathology Laboratory

_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
_______________________________________________
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet

Reply via email to