Hi Martin - Good suggestions!
One of the beauties of going with Open Historical Map is that we already have openhistoricalmap.org and openhistoricalmap.net. See: http://www.openhistoricalmap.org:3000/ (temporary... may not be there when you get there... ; ) ) - Jeff On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer < [email protected]> wrote: > > > 2013/2/28 Jeff Meyer <[email protected]> > >> All hail OHM!!! >> >> Ok - it seems like there's clear consensus here in the early results. >> Let's tentatively go with Open Historical Map, barring any feedback in the >> next few days that raises issues we haven't thought of. >> >> > > ohm.org seems to be for sale > openhistorymap.org is registered by Ewan Klein in the GB, is this any of > you? > > I'm fine with all names, also don't feel that HOSM would be too confusing, > as the humanitarian branch is usually called HOT, but hosm.org is taken > by C3 Computer Corporation ;-) > > openhm.org would be free, or maybe ohm.openstreetmap.org? or > historic.openstreetmap.org? > > cheers, > Martin > -- Jeff Meyer Global World History Atlas www.gwhat.org [email protected] 206-676-2347 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer> osm: Historical OSM<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historical_OSM> / my OSM user page <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer> t: @GWHAThistory <https://twitter.com/GWHAThistory> f: GWHAThistory <https://www.facebook.com/GWHAThistory>
_______________________________________________ Historic mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
