> Don't you think that time name-spacing is going to create a parsing nightmare
>over time? I would expect name collisions in a very short timespan. -rhw
Yes, it would get messy. But hey, we have a sandbox right now, so can try
whatever we want ;).
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>________________________________
> From: Robert Warren <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:25 AM
>Subject: Re: [OHM] temporal data in the OHM sandbox
>
>
>
>
>Don't you think that time name-spacing is going to create a parsing nightmare
>over time? I would expect name collisions in a very short timespan. -rhw
>
>> From: Mikel Maron <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> Without thinking about it much, there's a few options
>>
>> * associate 1 or mode nodes centered on the building via a relation. tag
>> each node with use and time span.
>> * time namespacing, ala language
>> localization?http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Related_concepts
>>
>>
>> * Mikel Maron *?+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Historic mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Historic mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
