That looks like quite a minor fault. If you know the data in the cadastre you will know that some properties do appear as many parcels: my Uncle's house consists of 5 parcels and I find it more or less impossible to interpret the cadastral data for his village even with decent imagery.
On 18 January 2014 17:36, Pieren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Lester Caine <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/funnybuilding.png was an example > Frederik > > posted at the time, but there where many more. > > Oh please. Watch the current data, not 3 years old archives. Also have > a look in the main French towns, Paris, Lyon, Marseille, Strasbourg, > Bordeaux, etc today. Of course, when the import is so long and done by > hundreds different contributors, it always easy to find some of them > who did not follow the guideline. But is it a reason to criticize the > whole process which is mainly a big success ? Such mistakes are fixed > when they are detected, like all others. It's not complicated and > doesn't need to be on site. Would you prefer to wait until perfect > data are published by the gouvernment ? Do you think that OSM > contributors always waited until they had perfect data to start > contributing ? > Chinese proverb : "When the sage points at the moon, the fool looks at > his finger" > > Pieren > > _______________________________________________ > Historic mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic >
_______________________________________________ Historic mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
