[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12754058#action_12754058
 ] 

Ashish Thusoo commented on HIVE-718:
------------------------------------

Apologies on following this earlier. It caught my attention as Todd brought up 
whether we should get this into 0.4.0 release as this is a regression when 
compared to 0.3.0. I checked the code on 0.3.0 and it seems to be the same as 
that in 0.4.0. So I am not sure if this is a regression. If this is not a 
regression then potentially we can go out with 0.4.0 without this and document 
this?

As is evident by this discussion LOAD INTO and its cousin INSERT INTO (when we 
have it) are very tricky. Almost all our code has been written with the 
overwrite semantics. Appending new data to an existing partition would need 
more work to get right and I feel we should punt it and document that insert 
into is not reliable - I think it has never been reliable.

In order to safely implement the INSERT INTO and LOAD INTO semantics one 
approach is to introduce a notion of versions on the DML commands which is 
encoded in the directory structure i.e.

instead of storing things as 

xyz/part-0000

we store the files as

xyz/v1/part-0000

and so on so forth. We store the latest created version in the metastore entry 
for that table. When a reader comes in it first looks at this entry and then 
finds a version corresponding to that in the table. The versions themselves 
could be garbage collected by deleting version directories that are older than 
say some configurable duration old and this could either be done lazily by the 
writer on the table or by an active garbage collector in the background. These 
are of course somewhat involved changes and would solve the isolation and 
atomicity problems. The later becase v1 is a directory so moving data to that 
directory would be a rename and hence atomic. Thoughts?


> Load data inpath into a new partition without overwrite does not move the file
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-718
>             Project: Hadoop Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.4.0
>            Reporter: Zheng Shao
>         Attachments: HIVE-718.1.patch, HIVE-718.2.patch, hive-718.txt
>
>
> The bug can be reproduced as following. Note that it only happens for 
> partitioned tables. The select after the first load returns nothing, while 
> the second returns the data correctly.
> insert.txt in the current local directory contains 3 lines: "a", "b" and "c".
> {code}
> > create table tmp_insert_test (value string) stored as textfile;
> > load data local inpath 'insert.txt' into table tmp_insert_test;
> > select * from tmp_insert_test;
> a
> b
> c
> > create table tmp_insert_test_p ( value string) partitioned by (ds string) 
> > stored as textfile;
> > load data local inpath 'insert.txt' into table tmp_insert_test_p partition 
> > (ds = '2009-08-01');
> > select * from tmp_insert_test_p where ds= '2009-08-01';
> > load data local inpath 'insert.txt' into table tmp_insert_test_p partition 
> > (ds = '2009-08-01');
> > select * from tmp_insert_test_p where ds= '2009-08-01';
> a       2009-08-01
> b       2009-08-01
> d       2009-08-01
> {code}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to