Hi Jean-Francois, On 7/7/05, Jean-Francois Poilpret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Knut, > > First of all, thank you for putting this into your TODO list ;-) > About the canConfigurationBeMapped(), in my situation I do not need it. > However, for the sake of exhaustivity, we should probably integrate it to > Registry as well, I believe. >
This is already off of my TODO list. I just checked the changes in earlier today. Along with the changes for supporting nulls in <invoke-parent>. Give it a try if you like! I also added isConfigurationMappable() (new name suggested by James) to the Registry interface. --knut --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
