I saw that and a user on the tapestry-users list needed to use it, but the one in Tapestry is private also. So, should I just take away the private designation?
> Probably we should; I had to create a shadow implementation of > ObjectTranslator for Tapestry 4. > > On 3/20/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All, >> >> Can we open up the visibility of the ObjectTranslator service? It would >> be >> useful for folks developing their own services which want to be able to >> parse values using the translator prefixes. >> >> James >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > Independent J2EE / Open-Source Java Consultant > Creator, Jakarta Tapestry > Creator, Jakarta HiveMind > > Professional Tapestry training, mentoring, support > and project work. http://howardlewisship.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > James Carman, President Carman Consulting, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
