All this license bullshit. What's the point. - ScarT
On 18 March 2010 22:12, Alexander Hirsch <1ze...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Really just depends on your ethics. > If you don't care what others do with it, choose the WTFPL or something. > If you want to give big freedom, but still credits a BSD-style licence is > good. > If you want to force others to pass on the freedom, a GPL-style licence is > good. > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:47 PM, David Kraeutmann <da...@davidkra.net> > wrote: > > LGPL is useless for standalone apps. BSD-style licenses are good tho'. > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Marek Sieradzki > > <marek.sierad...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> >> My vision is to create an user-friendly general purpose batch > compile > >>>> >> tool for Source Mods. It should be written in pure C++ and licensed > >>>> >> under a free software license such as the GNU GPL. It should be > >>>> >> developed in union with the modding community. > >> > >> GPL is far too restrictive. Use LGPL or BSD3. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
