30 replies of bashing and license discussion. Effectiving working here bros! The tools aren't really the problem, Hammer is to be honest.
- ScarT On 18 March 2010 22:50, Jonas 'Sortie' Termansen <[email protected]> wrote: > David Kraeutmann wrote: > > LGPL is useless for standalone apps. BSD-style licenses are good tho'. > > > That is not true. What if I wanted to copy code from my GPL'd program to > my LGPL library and the code is commited by others? > > If I released my Maxsi Compile tool under the GNU LGPLv3, then you are > allowed to copy its code to GNU LGPLv3 libraries. This would not be > permitted if I released it under GNU GPLv3. All my programs are > currently under GNU LGPLv3 (because of licensing issues with > implementing them in Source, just to be safe) and I frequently move code > between the actual .exe files and my shared library Maxsi Engine. I > would not be able to do that with code commited by others if I released > it under GNU GPLv3 - so that's a bit of a problem. If I am wrong about > any of this, feel free to correct me with properly sourced material. > > Whether to use GPL or LGPL is a matter of strategy and I am leaning > towards GPL here. > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlcoders
