So you are telling me you set up your servers so that if all of the HLDS processes allocated to that server were in use, the server would die in the arse because nobody checked that the server could in fact run all the HLDS processes allocated to them?
Maybe you would like to enlighten me on what sparticus' point really was? On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 03:51:31 -0000, Steven Hartland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I assume you don't run a GSP yourself then Whisper as you totally > missed spartibus point. > > Steve / K > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Whisper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It be bloody pointless running multiple HLDS processes on a machine > > unless the machine COULD cope with it running with all HLDS' full. If > > it cannot, then you're an idiot and have no business running a server > > in the first place, let alone one for a GSP. > > > > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:50:03 -0800, spartibus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ROFL Dennis, are you serious? I imagine that would be great for GSPs and > >> other people that run multiple servers on the same machine. > > > ================================================ > This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the > person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the > recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise > disseminating it or any information contained in it. > > In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please > telephone (023) 8024 3137 > or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
