the point is, if YOU are satisfied that someone is cheating why isn't that enough for you? It's certainly enough for me. If I see someone cheating, I ban them. If I get a demo of someone cheating on my servers, I ban them. End of story. I could care less about anyone complaining about getting banned. "You were banned for a reason, so go away kid, ya bother me." As if you need to justify yourself to anyone. Like I said, how can you not understand, they are your servers, you have the right to ban anyone at will for any reason. When you see proof of someone cheating, that's not enough for you? shrug. Doowutchyalike.
On 5/31/05, Alexander Kobbevik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And that's the response of a grown up, thank you. > > Did you read the whole mail, and see my suggestion? > Two people posted and told you they need this archive to justify bans, not > to see them over and over by them self. Why cant you either listen, or just > stop posting, when all you do is write the same thing over and over again. > We actually come with suggestions and explanations to why this is a problem. > You keep saying that we should just ban them and get over with it. That is > not a solution. > At least in my "screwed up points of view". > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clayton Macleod > Sent: 31. mai 2005 09:35 > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: Re: [hlds] Force demo playback? > > > After you know they're cheating, you ban. It's really quite simple. Do you > really need to view the demo over and over and over every day for a year to > remind yourself that he really was cheating and you did the right thing by > banning him? Somehow I doubt it. Once you've viewed it and it's been proven > to your satisfaction that he was cheating, I don't see why that's not the > end of the story. > > How is spelling out the situation for him provoking him? heh. I don't work > at Valve. I'm not the one that fixes bugs and/or makes changes to the > protocol. The fact that I tell him that this is what's done is provoking > him? Heh. He's a child, acting like a child, or both. That's got nothing to > do with me. You've both got really screwed up points of view as to what you > think is happening and what is really happening... > > On 5/31/05, Alexander Kobbevik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure how it works with CS:S but in 1.6 we have the possibility > > to load the demo onto a computer with wallhack... to see more clearly > > if this person is cheating. Making a avi doesn't give you much > > options. > > > > Maybe Valve would be kind enough to tell us what files we can backup > > to be able to see the demos even after the netcode is changed. So that > > those who wants to see old demos, can do so. > > > > Whisper is so right. > > Some people do things the right way. Not just ignorantly ban people > > because they are without rights to play on your server. > > > > PS: > > And i understand why he starts to use language when so many of you > > provoke him so bad. If Alfred is to take action towards Whisper, I > > would want actions to be taken against Clayton as well. > > He is doing things much worse. > > > > > > -Alexander > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > -- > Clayton Macleod > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- Clayton Macleod _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
