Quote from your link...."... and the application .exe must be flagged as a 3-GB-aware application."
Ray S. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Whisper Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 3:39 AM To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Introducing ServerWiki.org -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Don't you have to run your dual opterons in 32bit mode of something, maybe something got switched when the memory was upgraded. Also try the /3GB switch in boot.ini And maybe try: /USERVA= This switch is only supported on Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. Like the /3GB switch, this switch gives applications a larger address space. Specify the amount in MB between 2048 and 3072. This switch has the same application requirements as the /3GB switch and requires that the /3GB switch be present. Applies to 32-bit systems only. http://www.sysinternals.com/Information/bootini.html I know it doesn't make much sense but it seems you are at the stage where you are willing to try anything. Cheers On 10/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Again, as stated either in my previous comments on in the wiki, adding the > -heapsize switch/value is to no effect as that was the first thing we > tried. > We originally tried it with a larger value but I just attempted a startup > with the value you quoted and the results are the same. There must be > another answer to this question and you may drop 4GBs of RAM into any > Windows server to see for yourself the results. I'd love nothing more than > to have a simple command switch fix the issue but "-heapsize 128000" is > not > it Alfred. As this situation will come to be more and more prevalent with > the price of RAM dropping and the servers becoming more powerful to hold > more servers there must be an answer to this on the horizon. By all means, > test it yourself. "-heapsize ANYTHING" is not an answer. > > Ray S. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:52 AM > To: hlds@list.valvesoftware.com > Subject: RE: [hlds] Introducing ServerWiki.org > > Please start new threads when new questions arise :) I typically only > look at the first couple of emails in a thread. > > Add "-heapsize 128000" to the command line to get hlds to work on > machine with more than 4Gb of ram. > > - Alfred > > ----Original Message---- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Miller > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 11:44 PM To: > hlds@list.valvesoftware.com Subject: Re: [hlds] Introducing > ServerWiki.org > > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > On 10/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Then by all means allow me to post the answer to why we receive the > > > error "Available memory less than 15MB!!!" when we have 4GB of > > > system RAM and I > > > would be most happy to post that in any area of the wiki you direct > > > me to. > > > It is a pop-up window that says this and according to > > > steampowered.com <http://steampowered.com><http://steampowered.com>in > searching for that > > > phrase continues to be an unanswered question. One that > > > owners of very large/powerful servers would appreciate the answer > > > to I'm > > > sure. If where that question was placed was in error it would've > > > been for > > > lack of direction as to where to place it. Deleting a legitimate > > > question > > > in > > > the days of more powerful systems seems a tad inappropriate and more > > > suited > > > to a change of venue versus a complete deletion as it > > > well-described the > > > issue in brief but clear details. I would much appreciate the > > > opportunity > > > to > > > direct others that have not received this answer to their solution > > > but I > > > will be at the mercy of the developers on this one or someone who > > > has > > > overcome this situation. Attempts to create a new thread for this > > > issue > > > have > > > been in vain so I am left to replying to an existing thread. We are > > > to > > > understand from Linux users that they do not have this problem yet > > > with > > > HLDS > > > being "optimized for Windows", as they say, it would be most > > > helpful to > > > have > > > this answer and your wiki seemed like a perfect place to post it. > > > Beyond > > > that we come to this list for help and hope that it is to be found. > > > > > > > > I can guarantee that you won't find an answer on the wiki, nor would > > anyone > > be able to answer your question. The wiki has been up for all of 2 > > days now, > > and definately doesn't contain anything that advanced (hell, even the > > HLDS > > for windows setup isn't done yet!) > > > > > > This list is the perfect place for your question, Perhaps Alfred > > might be > > able to answer your question. I'm not sure if he'll look in this > > thread, > > though. > > > > -- > > --- > > Mike "DaiTengu" Miller > > Serverwiki Founder > > http://www.serverwiki.org > > > > H^2 | http://www.daitengu.com > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
