Yes, we use server checker, but it doesn't know the server has crashed until you click Ok. Also, AFAIK, -nocrashdialog does the same as disabling the crash dialog in control panel, this works fine in 2003, but in 2008 its simply replaced by another box.
2008/11/24 1nsane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Have a program like serverchecker monitor the server. That way if it > freezes > or crashes with an error message it will be automatically restarted. You > can > also try using -nocrashdialog. > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:08 AM, Olly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There is a big problem with server2008, if the server (srcds) crashes any > > script you have to restart it on crash will fail to work, because of the > > 'This program has ended unexpectedly' (or something like that). > > There is a way to turn this off in the settings, but this just shows a > > different error message. So to allow a server to finish crashing, you > will > > need to remote in, and click the close button on the popup. This was > > getting > > to be such a problem, we went back to 2003 > > > > 2008/11/24 Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > What I meant was that they are already trimmed down. From my > experience, > > > it > > > is more likely that you have too little on a server OS initially than > too > > > much. Also, like I said, I find it highly unlikely that Server 08 has > a > > > higher footprint than Server 03. > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 9:32 PM, J T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Server OSes are really not designed to be trimmed down? > > > > > > > > You would expect a server OS to have a light memory and cpu > footprint, > > > > giving more resources to the applications it will be running. > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > You are misinformed. Windows 2008 offers no drawbacks compared to > > > 2003. > > > > > Microsoft did not give server 2008 the Vista treatment in terms of > > > > resource > > > > > usage. Server OSes are really not designed to be trimmed down, > > unless > > > > you > > > > > are interested in running Server 2008 Core, which might be a good > > > option > > > > as > > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Midnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I fail to see the problem. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > With these 4 servers running total Ram usage is at %64. > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > archives, > > > > > > please visit: > > > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, > > > > > please visit: > > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > --------- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > archives, > > > > please visit: > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
