sv_search_max_ping 100 Would probably be the easiest way to do it.
Arnold Sitseri wrote: > Arg... I know there was a command that you can put into console that limits > what servers you (as lobby leader) will connect to. You can set it as a > lower number. It came up on the thread before... > > But there is a problem with just making a server ranking system. Think of it > as this, you might get horrible latency in a server in Japan, but for > Japanese people it's a great server. So it's possible that they have a good > server and what not, but it's just that you are a physical distance to far. > If anyone can remember that one command that's the solution to your problem. > > -----Original Message----- > From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com > [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of J T > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:00 PM > To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list > Subject: Re: [hlds] Left 4 Dead Server Quality Control > > Are you sure the lag isn't because of yours and your friends pings to the > server? > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Jake E <jackac...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> How would that help anyone else but the 3 people I play with daily (and >> myself)? >> >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Kingsley Foreman < >> kings...@internode.com.au >> >>> wrote: >>> >>> How about you rent your own server then it should never be an issue >>> and you want have to switch servers >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 20/01/2009, at 11:26 AM, "Andrew Armstrong" <and...@mammoth.com.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I thought the CPU Load (%) icon (like ping) in some games was always >>>> pretty >>>> neat. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >>>> [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Nephyrin Zey >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2009 11:20 AM >>>> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list >>>> Subject: Re: [hlds] Left 4 Dead Server Quality Control >>>> >>>> CONOSLE: Warning: You are playing on a Single-Core server. Expect Lag >>>> >>>> Lollz >>>> >>>> A rating system or something for servers maybe, but your whole >>>> idealized no-single-core (srcds is largely single threaded...) 2gig >>>> ram having thing sounds pretty snobby and ineffective at the same >>>> time. >>>> >>>> I run three lag free 32x TF2 servers on a 2.4GHz quad core with 4gigs >>>> of ram, and some old pentium 4 could run a single lag free L4D server >>>> pretty well. Network and configuration are usually vastly more >>>> important. >>>> >>>> I agree that on games with a server browser you can find and return to >>>> fun lag free servers, while outside of steam group servers l4d just >>>> throws you in there. >>>> >>>> One idea would be pushing steam group servers a lot more, IE have a >>>> 'hosted by' drop down that lets you pick steam groups, including ones >>>> you're not in but have played on before (assuming theirs arn't >>>> exclusive) or some such. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Jake E <jackac...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> HI, >>>>> >>>>> My Friends and I usually team up on campaign servers, and usually >>>>> it takes >>>>> 10-15 minutes to find a good dedicated server. The first one may >>>>> lag, the >>>>> second one may "shut down", and the third one may lag also. I was >>>>> just >>>>> wondering if we could have a form of server selecting or warning- >>>>> i.e., >>>>> Valve adds something that says "CONOSLE: Warning: You are playing >>>>> on a >>>>> Single-Core server. Expect Lag" when you join or maybe you could >>>>> see the >>>>> specs of the dedicated server you are about to join. Like the lobby >>>>> leader >>>>> sees "2.4 GHz Quad, 4000MB Ram. Accept? [YES] [NO]" Alternatively, >>>>> there >>>>> could be something like HLDSupdatetool checks your specs and says >>>>> "Please >>>>> upgrade your system to have at least a __._GHz Dual Core Processor >>>>> before >>>>> running left4dead." I know it's a long shot, but I think the Left 4 >>>>> Dead >>>>> community deserves to play on lag-free servers. >>>>> >>>>> Well also if you guys could do me a favor, we are putting up a >>>>> CS:Source >>>>> server and are thinking of just buying a dedicated server for our >>>>> >>>> CS:Source. >>>> >>>>> GMOD, and L4D, I know that the CPU usage of L4D is comparable to a >>>>> 26 slot >>>>> TF2 server, how good a box do you think we would need for all three >>>>> >>>> servers? >>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Jake >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>>>> archives, >>>>> >>>> please visit: >>>> >>>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>>> please visit: >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list >>>> archives, please visit: >>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >>> please visit: >>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, >> please visit: >> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds