Yes, I still avoid ANYTHING with the netgear logo on it. Ook wrote: > What model of a Netgear? Historically, Netgear routers have been for low > volume browse-the-web home users because of the limited size of their > routing table, and not really very usefull for anything that requires a lot > of connections. I once tried to run an open-nap server through one, and my > user count would ramp up to about 1000 or so, and then everything started > timing out. Connections all over my network would fail, and I finally > realized it was the router. After going back and forth with Netgear's > braindead support reps, I finally found someone at Netgear that admitted > that the routing table in the router was like 1024 in size, and they really > intended them to be used for AOL level users that just wanted to browse and > IM. That was a few years ago...maybe they finally got the idea and increased > it? > > Anyone been here long enough to remember my adventures in crap low end > routers several years ago? Netgear was towards the top of the list of > routers (and hardware in general) to avoid. > > Oh, and my butt itches... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Karl Weckstrom" <k...@weckstrom.com> > To: "Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list" > <hlds@list.valvesoftware.com> > Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 4:06 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds] [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] RE: VMware Advise > > > >> Yeah, I ordered a Netgear that does 1Q tagging and 10k jumbo frames (24 >> ports total). I figure I can do 2 vlan's for VM's (one for gameserver >> traffic, the other for web), 1 for vmotion, 1 for iSCSI. Should work >> nicely. >> $235 at newegg. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >> [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Chad Austin >> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 1:57 PM >> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list >> Subject: Re: [hlds] [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] RE: VMware Advise >> >> Wow. >> >> Personally I use a Cisco 6500 switch at home. It can handle a ton of >> traffic. >> >> Rick Payton wrote: >> >>> The [SPAM] thing was my fault actually - I rearranged the ESXi letters >>> to to say "secksi" only spelled with the 4 letters - and my company >>> firewall picked it up and labeled it spam. >>> >>> --mauirixxx >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com >>> [mailto:hlds-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Chad Austin >>> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 11:03 AM >>> To: Half-Life dedicated Win32 server mailing list >>> Subject: [SPAM] Re: [hlds] [SPAM] RE: VMware Advise >>> >>> I like this [SPAM] tag, but I don't think people will tag their 'OMG >>> VALVE IS EVILL!!!!!!11!!1!1' threads with it, maybe a [CHAT] tag or >>> something else would be better for things not directly related to >>> running dedicated servers. >>> >>> J T wrote: >>> >>> >>>> 1Q is awesome. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Karl Weckstrom <k...@weckstrom.com> >>>> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> >>>>> Yeah, I may actually replace all my little home-based switches and >>>>> >>>>> >>> get one >>> >>> >>>>> decent managed switch and just do 1Q myself. >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please > visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds > >
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds
