There's a perl one available ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Hobbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:58 AM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D
> Slight decrease in traffic, but all the regulars are still there. > > I think as word spreads about the All New C-D (tm) numbers will pick up > again. > > Running C-D client side is less hassle than putting up with cheats ruining > your fun. > > I might look into running a mediator if one comes out that doesn't require > logd, statsme or amxmod. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of HLDS List > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D > > > So what's the preferred configuration? C-D + HLGuard or C-D alone? I love > HLGuard's wallhack block, but hate the extra drain on my servers. If C-D is > an all-in-one tool, that'd be fantastic! > Have you noticed any decrease in traffic by running your server in Insecure > mode? > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
