[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] VAC or C-D
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:10:06AM -0800, Jules (aka Buddha-Pest)
> wrote:
> > ummm, no...
> >
> > i'm glad you're on the team, but that's not the way i remember it.
> > unless you guys changed a bunch of stuff.
> >
> > what CD does on the client side is inject itself into hl the same
> > way most cheats do thus preventing cheats from loading.
> >
> > if you are really detecting cheats, why NOT send the info to the
> > server?
> >
> > me thinks you're fibbing a bit here.
>
> > > "Mike Hodgkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > LOL
> > > > It does detect cheats, it just doesnt tell the server. Thats why
> > > > you get code errors if you try loading it up with OGC. Im on
> > > > the UA anticheat team, I know what Im talking about.
>
> Jules, don't top post.
>
> C-D does detect, but doesn't tell.  It would be mint if it did tell.
>
> From what I can gather C-D only responds to server probes.  If
> the HL client give errors before its joined the HL Server then
> the C-D server can't send a probe so won't get a reponse.
> Skitzo - does this sound right?

Heh, yeah, you made things so much clearer with your bottom post to the
top post and not trimming anything else away ;)

--
Eric (the Deacon remix)

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to