That doesn't seem like 1 single array :P And you know that we'll have to kill you when you write stuff like C:
/Oscar
Ronin wrote:
<C: 95.13GB out of 114.47GB > <F: 14.53GB out of 19.06GB > <H: 1.05GB out of 271.98GB > <I: 1.03GB out of 4GB > <P: 65.64GB out of 739.44GB > <q: 35.88GB out of 679.94GB > <r: 316.38GB out of 679.99GB > <s: 1.03GB out of 50.99GB > <I have 530.67GB free out of 2559.87GB available>
IRC script I have that shows what I have in space on each one of my drives.
Now THAT is a raid array :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Oscar N aka 'Dreadful'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:49 PM Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Dualie Athlons?
buffer)bah, stop telling yourself lies. I mean, if you don't want to go with scsi raid, then who can resist an 3ware escalade controller with 12 120gb IDE discs ;)
No, time to sleep and wake up 6hours later with 284new messages from this spam list :P
/Oscar
Me wrote:
Yes that would be great. But do I _NEED_ the additional speed? Can I do what I need in 60 minutes if I use IDE?
I would use some sort of RAID add-on controller (any suggestions?). Here are the three configurations I might want to use:
2 WD1200BB hard drives on RAID 0 (Western Digital 120GB 8mb 7200rpm
buffer)4 WD400JB hard drives on RAID 0 (Western Digital 40GB 8mb 7200rpm
20GB.3 KW018L2 hard drives on RAID 0 (Quantum Atlas II 18GB 10k rpm SCSI 160)
I don't think space will be an issue. I don't imagine using more than
please visit:
/me think you should buy four 15k rpm scsi drives, put them in an raid 0 array and hell we got some speeeed :)
Me wrote:
Well...
Not to egg things on but I would be interested in everyones take on this. Personally I've got 10k U160 drives in two of my PCs at home. One PC is IDE as are the servers. I know I know, kinda stupid. But my servers don't do much but store mp3s. :P
Now, I'm getting ready to set up a server for my training room. I'm going to be running Linux on it. I'm going to use it to store Ghost images. I'll be restoring the images on 15 computers at a time. As long as I can get all the computers done in 60 min I'm happy. I really have 2 hours but...
From what I could tell current top of the line IDE hard drives can put
out 30MB/sec where current top of the line SCSI hard drives can put out 40MB/sec. I got this information from storagereview.com. I haven't seen the test results on the 10k SATA drives yet but I don't think I would go that way.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Linux's support for SCSI hard drives much better than it's support for UDMA chipsets? Won't I have a better chance getting the drive's maximum performance if I go SCSI?
If that's not true, then I would prefer to save the money and go IDE.
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 23:16, Ronin wrote:
So, anyone up for some good SCSI vs IDE action?What I find most funny is that everyone else is wrong and he is right. Typical child mentality. And your information is STILL wrong, Stefan. *chuckles*
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
