Who said this release is laggy? Sure it uses more CPU but as long as your machine can handle it there is no problem. In fact I'm pretty sure this release performs better for the client , not so much on linux, but in windows it seems quite a lot better.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Britt Priddy (PZGN) Sent: 29 September 2003 05:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The CPU usage issue.. what should I go with: Linux or Win32? Not saying that - we run no more than 2 hlds procs per machine - never a 20/20 player server on the same box - maybe a 14 player with a 20 player - and league matches have a occured these past few days and the only complaint is the Spec bug in TFC - (server locking up / freezing) - thats it - no complaints of lag/choke, etc, etc... So no matter what numbers are saying - as long as it performs as it has - no problems on our end....so far...*cough* Britt ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Sykes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:48 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] The CPU usage issue.. what should I go with: Linux or Win32? > Lets not deny that this release is using A LOT more cpu than the last. > Its pretty much FACT - unless you happen to be one of the lucky few with > a SUPER KERNEL that runs 5% cpu with a 32 player server....and we all > know that's bs. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Britt > Priddy (PZGN) > Sent: 29 September 2003 03:33 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The CPU usage issue.. what should I go with: > Linux or Win32? > > exactly what m0gely said. > > less CPU for me on AMD 2800+ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "m0gely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:11 PM > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] The CPU usage issue.. what should I go with: > Linux > or Win32? > > > > James Sykes wrote: > > >>If the new linux HLDS is really doubling CPU usage over 3.1.1.0c > then > > > > > > how > in the world can I host enough games to cover the cost of my > > > server? > > > > > > You don't :) > > > > At 14 players in de_aztec, I don't see anywhere near double the CPU. > It's > a > > little more, Double though? C'mon. Right now I have 14 players in > de_inferno > > and it's 38% on my dual AMP MP 2400+. This is with MM 1.16, VAC, HLG > 1.5, > AMX > > 0.9.3 (stats disabled) and Statsme 2.7.1. This is hardly any > different > then > > before w/ 3.1.1.0c. It's not good, but not really any different. > > > > -- > > - m0gely > > http://quake2.telestream.com/ > > Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
