Britt Priddy (PZGN) wrote:
Not really - its easy to secure a network.
Well, if it is so easy to secure a network, why was Valve's network so exposed? This would assume, from your premise, that Valve made no attempt to secure their network whatsoever.
"Not a lot of work to secure their Network" - I promise youSo, if it is not a lot of work, why have they not done it before now?
If you know it is not a lot of work, should I assume you have intimate knowledge of their network? If it transpires your the network administrator, a lot of questions become self explanatory...
- their network will be more secure than yours :-) They know the holes - think someone could plant the stuff on your network that was planted on valves? I bet valve knows how to prevent it now - do you?
I could never say my network was 100% secure - no network administrator could. Network security is about common sense and reducing your exposure to security breaches, and is more about protecting yourself from unknown threats rather than known ones.
Dont be such a cracker and sharpen up - bitching and moaning will get ya now where quick. In fact, I think you're already there.
No comment :)
_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
