We've played with Hyperthreading on/off on our WIN32 platforms. - We've come to the conclusion that the OS (even though the game doesnt) manages the threads better with it on rather then off. We don't run enough Linux based platforms to really have tested much. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Kercher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 1:47 PM Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help!
> Hyperthreading is usually disabled in the BIOS of the machine. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Patel, Monil > > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 12:12 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! > > > > How do i go about disabling hyper threading? > > > > On top of that, > > I have just identified that we're losing packets from the > > gateway to the server > > > > but I still want to disbalbe hyper threading if it makes them > > perform better! > > > > Monil > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nelson Marques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 6:01 PM > > Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! > > > > > > > > > > I do agree with you, but some 'power mongers' here just said I was > > > wrong a couple of days ago. > > > Welcome to the 'wise ones' club :) > > > > > > Nelson > > > > > > Steven Hartland wrote: > > > > > > >I would try disabling hyperthreading we found it caused > > lag in most > > > >cases. > > > > Steve / K > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Patel, Monil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 4:04 PM > > > >Subject: [hlds_linux] loss + choke - help! > > > > > > > > > > > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > > >-- > > > >[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Hey, > > > > > > > >I'm running six cstrike processes on my dual xeons (2.4ghz > > 2gb ddr) & > > > >3 > > on my p4's (2.4ghz 1gb ddr). it is connected through a > > > >10/100 switchport, people are complaining of loss (0-10 but 10-20 > > > >when > > busy). i am using default redhat 8.0 kernel, > > > > > > > >top shows: > > > >CPU0 states: 58.3% user, 1.4% system, 0.0% nice, 39.1% idle > > > >CPU1 states: 51.1% user, 2.1% system, 0.0% nice, 46.1% idle > > > >CPU2 states: 48.1% user, 2.3% system, 0.0% nice, 48.4% idle > > > >CPU3 states: 49.0% user, 1.0% system, 0.0% nice, 48.0% idle > > > > > > > >any ideas? > > > > > > > >monil > > > >-- > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > >archives, > > please visit: > > > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > > >archives, > > please visit: > > > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the > > list archives, > > please visit: > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list > > archives, please visit: > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > > > > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
