Maybe it could first check the linprocfs and if it is not present use
his alternate method?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Simon Garner wrote:
On Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:47 PM NZT,
Jeremy Brooking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am i missing something, but cant this info be taken from the kernel?
If it's just the CPU MHz, yep... (cat /proc/cpuinfo) - hence why I
wondered if it's trying to determine something more than that?
Not that simple. I think Alfred is looking for a way that will work for
all systems, not just those who've decided to enable proc fs in their
kernels :P
john
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux