Maybe it could first check the linprocfs and if it is not present use
his alternate method?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Simon Garner wrote:



On Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:47 PM NZT,
Jeremy Brooking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Am i missing something, but cant this info be taken from the kernel?



If it's just the CPU MHz, yep... (cat /proc/cpuinfo) - hence why I
wondered if it's trying to determine something more than that?



Not that simple. I think Alfred is looking for a way that will work for all systems, not just those who've decided to enable proc fs in their kernels :P

john

_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux






_______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to