Didnt get the time to upgrade the servers yesterday... But I managed to
write a Fedora 4 port. Ill test it today or tomorrow... now off to install
new servers.

/Bjorn

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, kama wrote:

>
> Hmm, I looked at our admin mailbox and it seems that I also gets a lot of
> crashes with the latest version of hlds. (30-50 per day) I'll try to
> upgrade to a newer glibc tomorrow and see if that will fixes the crash
> problem.
>
> /Bjorn
>
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, kama wrote:
>
> >
> > FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Apr 26 00:23:33 CEST 2004
> > kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, tickadj = 1, profhz = 1024, 
> > stathz = 128 }
> > linux_base-8-8.0_4
> > glibc-2.3.2
> >
> > FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #1: Tue Dec 14 10:41:28 CET 2004
> > kern.clockrate: { hz = 1000, tick = 1000, tickadj = 1, profhz = 1024, 
> > stathz = 128 }
> > linux_base-8-8.0_4
> > glibc-2.3.2
> >
> > FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Tue Jan  4 20:37:41 CET 2005
> > kern.clockrate: { hz = 10000, tick = 100, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
> > linux_base-rh-9
> > glibc-2.3.2
> >
> > FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Wed Jun  8 22:14:07 CEST 2005
> > kern.clockrate: { hz = 2000, tick = 500, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
> > linux_base-rh-9
> > glibc-2.3.2
> >
> > All these runs HL1...
> >
> > /Bjorn
> >
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Gary wrote:
> >
> > > Can you post some other info? Is it 5 or 4? What linux ABI are you
> > > using (redhat, slackware, etc) ?
> > >
> > >
> > > At 02:46 AM 8/16/2005, kama wrote:
> > >
> > > >Could this cause choke on the server for us on FBSD? All my servers 
> > > >chokes
> > > >even if there are a single hlds started. The server or the bandwidth
> > > >should not be a problem. The servers are connected to a 7609. It should 
> > > >be
> > > >powerful enough. The chokes started to appear aprox the same time as the
> > > >first upgrade of HL1 to support VAC2. The linux ABI kernel support 
> > > >version
> > > >is 2.4.2.
> > > >
> > > >compat.linux.osname: Linux
> > > >compat.linux.osrelease: 2.4.2
> > > >compat.linux.oss_version: 198144
> > > >
> > > >/Bjorn
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Alfred Reynolds wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The problem appears to be a bug in the threading library exposed when
> > > > > two threads wait on two different condition variables at the same 
> > > > > time.
> > > > > Depending on your OS and particular OS version the fix could be either
> > > > > upgrading GLIBC or upgrading your kernel (the 2.6.x series in Linux 
> > > > > has
> > > > > integrated some threading support directly into the kernel, see
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_POSIX_Thread_Library and
> > > > > http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT6753699732.html ).
> > > > >
> > > > > SRCDS doesn't have this issue because it is not running the latest VAC
> > > > > client (it will soon however).
> > > > >
> > > > > We are looking into other solutions (for example rewriting the code to
> > > > > remove the possibility of triggering the library bug) but we have no
> > > > > solid dates for an update.  In the meantime you can upgrade your
> > > > > library/kernel versions to those reported to work by others on this
> > > > > list.
> > > > >
> > > > > - Alfred
> > > > >
> > > > > ----Original Message----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of m0gely
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2005 11:05 PM To:
> > > > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Half-Life
> > > > > 1: Engine update released
> > > > >
> > > > > > Gary wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Personally, I would make every effort to run 5, because as some
> > > > > > > others have said, it's not supported anymore, and has more fixes 
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > the kernel (mpsafe net, more linux fixes etc)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SRCDS runs fine though.  I don't understand the problem here because
> > > > > > I can get different results depending on what Linux ABI I choose to
> > > > > > install.  And (I think) the Linux ports are the same in 4.x or 5.x.
> > > > > > Now, obviously there are others here that show having success using
> > > > > > 5.x, but I think this is completely fruity that SRCDS works, HLDS
> > > > > > doesn't, and now I have to got fetch a server, bring it home and do 
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > major OS for such a problem.
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > > archives, please visit:
> > > > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >
> > > >...this page intentionally not left blank....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list
> > > >archives, please visit:
> > > >http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
> > > please visit:
> > > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> > You can tune a filesystem, but you can't tune a fish.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, 
> > please visit:
> > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
> >
>
> --
>
> My co-workers are idiots...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
> visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>

--

 > Am I pretty? Tell me I'm pretty.
--

if (female) printf("You are pretty");
--

else printf("You are lonely");


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to