-- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] The windows server version is generaly better because it just is. Valve designed HLDS for windows. And then made a linux port.
On 9/25/05, ScratchMonkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --On Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:35 PM -0500 "Eric (Deacon)" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > on the same hardware, a Windows HLDS install > > will perform better than a Linux hlds installation > > As a wild guess, I'll assume you mean some kind of benchmark within the > binary gives better numbers on Win32. Which Win32? What do you suppose > accounts for the difference? Poor compiler? Choice of optimizations? > Specific other processes stealing cycles? (Recall that neither Win32 nor > Linux are monolithic and exact objects; both are assemblies of varying and > versioned components.) > > If a Windows install is better, we should determine exactly what the issue > is that keeps Linux from matching it. The first step to that objective is > to establish exactly what we're measuring. > > _______________________________________________ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, > please visit: > http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux > -- _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit: http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
