ahh thanks. will do and see how i go.

Ronny Schedel wrote:
> This is C, it's not commented out, what you see are defines with a
> starting
> "#". Yes, you have to apply this patch.
> A comment in C starts with //
>
> Regards
> Ronny
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave "M3PH" Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] OK, getting frustrated now!
>
>
>> i had a look thru that how to just out of interest to see if there was
>> anything i could do to improve performance any more than i have (part of
>> the linux learning curve) and i found something very interesting. my
>> whole param.h is one big comment. For both i386 and x86_64. I'm running
>> suse 10.2 and have kernel 2.6.18.2 and that latest alsa drivers (1.0.14
>> i think). I also use the deadline schedular as some one told me once it
>> was better than the other two and i agree as it is the best of both
>> worlds.
>>
>> But my question really, is, is the fact my param.h files entirely
>> commented out normal or is this some fluky thing that means i don't need
>> to use the patch?
>>
>> cheers guys
>>
>> Ronny Schedel wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> you can try and install hotsanic (http://hotsanic.sourceforge.net/).
>>> It will
>>> give you a better overview what really happens on your system.
>>> Install at
>>> least the modules traffic, system and netstat.
>>>
>>> Also follow this tutorial for a good kernel:
>>> http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=486424
>>>
>>> Most important stuff is the 1000 Hz patch and the scheduler settings.
>>>
>>> After you have a well configured kernel, don't use taskset or
>>> anything to
>>> force the processes to a specific CPU, the scheduler will do for you
>>> very
>>> well.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Ronny
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Syers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: <hlds_linux@list.valvesoftware.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:52 PM
>>> Subject: [hlds_linux] OK, getting frustrated now!
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>>> Can someone explain the following, or if it is just shite coding on
>>> valves
>>> part:
>>>
>>> * I run a server that has a dual core pentium 3.4GHz processor and
>>> runs 2 x
>>> 100 tick 18 man CSS servers.
>>> * It has the kernel compiled at 1000
>>> * My startup line has +fps_max 600 (will largely hold 333fps)
>>>
>>> I can look at the server cpu usage, memory usage and CSS "stats" all
>>> in real
>>> time.
>>>
>>> Now why the hell does a server drop from 333fps to as low as 10fps?
>>> What
>>> causes this?
>>>
>>> The CPU usage gets no higher than 60% (one core for the process -
>>> other is
>>> at 1-5% if the other server is empty), but the drops can happen at
>>> 60% or
>>> anywhere below, so the CPU usage seems to have no bearing on this.
>>>
>>> The memory usage does not change - I have memory that is not
>>> currently in
>>> use, so this seems not to be a factor either.
>>>
>>> I have no swap being used, the server is regularly rebooted to clear
>>> any
>>> memory that is not released (although as mentioned I have spare) and
>>> all
>>> servers except literally the ones to run the server have been stopped
>>> (but
>>> as mentioned CPU usage is never over 60%, and system use is negligable)
>>>
>>> I am totally confused as to why the fps will not stay above 100 when
>>> the
>>> hardware is clearly not struggling!!
>>>
>>> Would it be better to force is to use the 486 process instead of the
>>> 686??
>>> --
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>>> please visit:
>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>>> please visit:
>>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
>> please visit:
>> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
> please visit:
> http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
>
>


_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to