Sorry I didn't read you're original post about what you're problem might be
but I'm sure I can help if it's not an unfixable steam bug. 
 
This communication and any accompanying document(s) are privileged and
confidential, and are intended for the sole use of the addressee(s).  If you
have received this transmission in error, you are advised that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance
upon it is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in
error, please return the message via email reply and immediately delete it
from your system.
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Bento de Gier
Date: 5/21/2008 1:06:18 AM
To: 'Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list'
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HL1 Client Problems
 
Alright, this doesn't solve my problem lads :) It still exists.
 
Met vriendelijke groet,
Regards,
 
Bento de Gier
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Kyle
Verzonden: woensdag 21 mei 2008 8:51
Aan: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Onderwerp: Re: [hlds_linux] HL1 Client Problems
 
I actually don't care what anyone thinks and I'm not here to prove to anyone
that I'm right.
 
I just find it funny when people who don't know what their talking about
state things as absolutes instead of posing them as questions.
 
And of course as usual anytime people quote what other supposed valve
employees say they almost always fail to get the persons name so the people
who DO know what their talking about, can verify it.
 
I just point out were people are wrong and leave it at that.
 
Then theres morons like "Gebi"  who take almost any response either out of
context or the wrong way and those  D-bags post's are always fun to read.
 
Then theres people like you,     QUOTE  "whomever this was ran through A
series of tests"  END QUOTE.
 
 
Like me running servers for 4 years and doing countless tests, thousands of
times means nothing.
 
God,  forums are funny and they and the people who post on them will never
change.
They will be stupid until they die and always want someone to just give them
the answer or do a search for them or post a link were they can get the
answer to their problem because their too stupid or lazy to simply read and
learn for themselves.
 
 
FINALY  (since you say my link is broken that proves what I'm saying is
true),    Heres a link to whispers server Wiki which I'll admit has many
errors some of which I have pointed out to him over the years we both have
been members of this list ( I been a member under many names for over 7
years),   But even he agrees that the sv_maxrate for hlds is 30.000 and all
I have said is that its 25.000 for Internet, which is true.
Http://whisper.ausgamers.com/wiki/index
php/Noob_guide_to_netgraph_/_ping#RATE
 
 
Oh and by the way whisper, you need to update you're server wiki, because
the command line is not the only place to add the sys_ticrate command for
hlds.    I have it in my server.cfg and it works just fine, But I guess that
s what you get when you simply take quotes from the steam support web site
and call them you're own wiki.     And if you mean that's just for SRCDS
then you need to define that properly in you're wiki.
 
Once again logic and intelligence prevails over lazy people.      READING
ftw
 
 
This communication and any accompanying document(s) are privileged and
confidential, and are intended for the sole use of the addressee(s).  If you
have received this transmission in error, you are advised that any
disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance
upon it is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in
error, please return the message via email reply and immediately delete it
from your system.
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Richard Eid
Date: 5/20/2008 8:41:15 PM
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] HL1 Client Problems
 
I wish I could find it on the forums somewhere, but at one point, someone
actually tested the various rate settings and found that the max was 20000.
Aside from AnAkIn's communication with Valve, whomever this was ran through
a series of tests and determined, not by e-mail or the like, by throughput,
the rate was a maximum value of 20000.  Maybe it was AnAkIn...whoever it was
provided a nice set of pics to show the differences in rate values.
 
I'm not sure why you take that tone with him, though.  He's only trying to
be helpful.  He also has documentation stating that what he has posted here
are the correct values to use.  If you can provide some evidence to the
contrary, I'd love to see it.  I'd hate to be spreading misinformation by
advising people of a rate max of 20000.
 
Also, your link is broken.
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
 
 
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives,
please visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please 
visit:
http://list.valvesoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/hlds_linux

Reply via email to