The original source uses scope.in_form

Bryan

Steve Van Bruwaene wrote:
> This works great for the show page.  Unfortunately it also filters out 
> all the null values on the edit page, which means I can't set them.
> 
> I'm looking at the expanded stuff in rapid_core.dryml.  How can I 
> determine if we're in view or edit mode?
> 
> Thanks again!
> 
> Steve.
> 
> --
> Steve Van Bruwaene
> International Teams Canada
> Special Projects
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://www.vanbruwaene.ca
> "Developing Resources that help IT Canada be More Effective in its Mission."
> 
> IT Canada: 519-669-8844, 1 Union St., Elmira, ON, N3B 3J9
> IT US: 847-429-0900, 411 West River Road, Elgin, IL 60123, USA
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Bryan Larsen <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     The tag definitions in Hobo can be pretty intimidating.   Here's a
>     stripped down field-list that should be a lot easier to follow:
> 
>     <def tag="field-list" attrs="fields">
>       <labelled-item-list>
>         <with-fields fields="&fields">
>           <labelled-item>
>             <item-label>
>               <%= this_field_name %>
>             </item-label>
>             <item-value>
>               <view/>
>             </item-value>
>           </labelled-item>
>         </with-fields>
>       </labelled-item-list>
>     </def>
> 
>     Now you can modify that to add what you need:
> 
>     <labelled-item if="&!this.nil?">
> 
>     Try that out and see if it works -- I may have been a little bit to
>     aggressive in stripping.   You can refer to the original source if
>     something appears to be missing.
> 
>     If it works for you, you can try modifying the original field-list in
>     rapid_core.dryml to make this an optional feature.  Then you can send in
>     a patch.   We love getting patches!
> 
>     cheers,
>     Bryan
> 
>     Steve VB wrote:
>      > When I look at a record, (show page), all fields (except those flaged
>      > "never_show" are displayed, whether they have content or not.
>      >
>      > In my (and probably many others), null fields aren't relevant here.
>      > For example, in an address-book type table, there may be 50
>     fields for
>      > different addresses, email, etc. When viewing the record, only the
>      > subset of fields that actually has data is relevant. Displaying all
>      > the null fields just wastes screen space, and makes it a little
>     harder
>      > to see the relevant data.  Is there any way to only display the
>     fields
>      > that actually have something in them?
>      >
>      > I see it's using Rapid's <field-list> to display fields.  Is there
>      > anything I can do to override <field-list>? Is there any chance of
>      > <field-list> being updated to have the option of filtering out null
>      > fields?
>      >
>      > Thanks!
>      >
>      > Steve.
>      > >
>      >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo 
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to