Cool! thanks!
I've got the code updated to do what I want:
<def tag="field-list" attrs="tag, no-edit">
<% tag ||= scope.in_form ? "input" : "view"; no_edit ||= "skip" %>
<labelled-item-list merge-attrs="&attributes - attrs_for(:with_fields)">
<with-fields merge-attrs="&attributes & attrs_for(:with_fields)">
<% field_name = this_field_name
input_attrs = {:no_edit => no_edit} if tag == "input" && no_edit ==
"disable"
-%>
<labelled-item unless="&((tag == 'input' && no_edit == 'skip' &&
!can_edit?) || (tag == 'view' && this.nil?))">
<item-label param="#{this_field.to_s.sub('?', '')}-label"
unless="&field_name.blank?">
<do param="label"><%= field_name %></do>
</item-label>
<item-value param="#{this_field.to_s.sub('?', '')}-view" colspan="&2
if field_name.blank?">
<do param="view"><call-tag tag="&tag"
param="#{this_field.to_s.sub('?', '')}-tag"
merge-attrs="&input_attrs"/></do>
<div param="input-help" if="&tag.to_sym == :input &&
!this_field_help.blank?"><%= this_field_help %></div>
</item-value>
</labelled-item>
</with-fields>
</labelled-item-list>
</def>
I'm pretty new to ruby and rails, and especially hobo. I'd love to
parametrize this so it can be added to the main hobo system rather than
needing to maintain my own. Looking at the code here, I'm having trouble
figuring out how you currently pass stuff. I'm guessing no-edit (in the top
attrs field) is a parameter being passed in. I don't see where it's used.
You set no_edit (with underscore rather than hyphen) manually, but don't
seem to be getting the data from anywhere. Is this a bug, or am I missing
something?
Thanks for all the help. hopefully as I learn more about hobo, I'll be able
to start contributing to the project too!
Steve.
--
Steve Van Bruwaene
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Bryan Larsen <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> The original source uses scope.in_form
>
> Bryan
>
> Steve Van Bruwaene wrote:
> > This works great for the show page. Unfortunately it also filters out
> > all the null values on the edit page, which means I can't set them.
> >
> > I'm looking at the expanded stuff in rapid_core.dryml. How can I
> > determine if we're in view or edit mode?
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > Steve.
> >
> > --
> > Steve Van Bruwaene
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Bryan Larsen <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The tag definitions in Hobo can be pretty intimidating. Here's a
> > stripped down field-list that should be a lot easier to follow:
> >
> > <def tag="field-list" attrs="fields">
> > <labelled-item-list>
> > <with-fields fields="&fields">
> > <labelled-item>
> > <item-label>
> > <%= this_field_name %>
> > </item-label>
> > <item-value>
> > <view/>
> > </item-value>
> > </labelled-item>
> > </with-fields>
> > </labelled-item-list>
> > </def>
> >
> > Now you can modify that to add what you need:
> >
> > <labelled-item if="&!this.nil?">
> >
> > Try that out and see if it works -- I may have been a little bit to
> > aggressive in stripping. You can refer to the original source if
> > something appears to be missing.
> >
> > If it works for you, you can try modifying the original field-list in
> > rapid_core.dryml to make this an optional feature. Then you can send
> in
> > a patch. We love getting patches!
> >
> > cheers,
> > Bryan
> >
> > Steve VB wrote:
> > > When I look at a record, (show page), all fields (except those
> flaged
> > > "never_show" are displayed, whether they have content or not.
> > >
> > > In my (and probably many others), null fields aren't relevant
> here.
> > > For example, in an address-book type table, there may be 50
> > fields for
> > > different addresses, email, etc. When viewing the record, only the
> > > subset of fields that actually has data is relevant. Displaying
> all
> > > the null fields just wastes screen space, and makes it a little
> > harder
> > > to see the relevant data. Is there any way to only display the
> > fields
> > > that actually have something in them?
> > >
> > > I see it's using Rapid's <field-list> to display fields. Is there
> > > anything I can do to override <field-list>? Is there any chance of
> > > <field-list> being updated to have the option of filtering out
> null
> > > fields?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Steve.
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hobo
Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hobousers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
