> At various jobs I pulled 10base2 coax, then 10base5 coax, then twisted
> pair.  [Well someone pulled it, but not me.]  Anyone remember vampire
> taps in 10base2?  What a reliability headache!

Pulled from cable hanging in a "plenum" in a secure building... Because
there was no way to get cable floor to floor other than through that
single shaft. For a Xerox Star system. Then there was the token bus for
the little Novell network over in legal --another disaster. <blech>

> Back on topic: I do think we should consider OSPF (not so keen on
> ISIS, but OK) and should not rule out OLSRv2 or other LLN related work
> and MANET work (though I'm far from an expert on LLN or MANET).

IS-IS is easier to get to "zero config," and it's actually simpler in
operation... Which is why I brought it up. :-)

> We will have to extend OSPF to make zero config possible.  The
> extensions should be completely backwards compatible if at all
> possible.

Yes, I agree... Or we need w new wired/wireless protocol that jumps both
worlds, and would actually be acceptable and implemented by a large
number of vendors. But that's another entire problem space...

:-)

Russ
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to