>>>>> "Mattia" == Mattia Rossi <mattia.rossi.mailingli...@gmail.com> writes:
    Mattia> might become:

    Mattia>   The home network needs to be adaptable to such ISP
    Mattia> policies, and thus make no assumptions about the stability
    Mattia> of the prefix received from an ISP, or the length of the
    Mattia> prefix that may be offered. However, if only a /64 is
    Mattia> offered by the ISP, the homenet may be severely
    Mattia> constrained. Attempting to use subnet prefixes longer than
    Mattia> /64 would break SLAAC, and is thus not recommended. Using
    Mattia> ULA prefixes internally with NPTv6 at the boundary would be
    Mattia> possible, but is not recommended for reasons given
    Mattia> elsewhere. The least damaging solution would be for the
    Mattia> internal routers to revert to bridging mode, even though
    Mattia> this would destroy the benefits of subnetting.  There are

I am opposed to this text.

    Mattia> cases where neither bridging mode nor NPTv6, nor DHCPv6 are
    Mattia> feasible, e.g. if there are LLN subnets within the homenet
    Mattia> which require remote access. In such cases a /64 assignment
    Mattia> from an ISP will break the home network, and should
    Mattia> therefore be avoided.

please remember that multicast is hostile to plain wifi, and regularly
breaks it, if you bridge wired to wireless.

-- 
Michael Richardson
-on the road-

Attachment: pgp6i99IQjO0G.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to