On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk>wrote:

> On 13/11/12 19:04, Jim Gettys wrote:
>
>
>> So the recursive DHCP-PD scheme strikes me as something possibly very
>> fragile. I really, really don't want to repeat the experience I had with
>> having extra DHCP servers, and I would guess few ISP's do either.
>>
>> It seems to me much more robust to flood the key configuration information
>> (prefixes, DNS, NTP, and the like) via a protocol that is really designed
>> for the job (whether specifically for configuration, ie. ahcp
>> http://www.pps.univ-paris-**diderot.fr/~jch/software/ahcp/<http://www.pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr/~jch/software/ahcp/>
>> **, or via the hacks
>> on routing protocols like Ari has done with OSPF).
>>
>
> Given that hosts are going to want to talk RA or DHCPv6, at least
> initially, one option down this route has the flood include the unicast
> address of a single, centralised DHCPv6 server, and routers run DHCP-relay
> agents which forward to that address. That gives you DHCPv6 functionality
> without recursive-PD complications. It also eliminates the problems of
> distributing the available prefixes as they traverse PD chains. The
> one-and-only DHCP server knows about all the prefixes delegated from the
> ISP and the relays know which particular prefix has been given to the local
> router by the routing protocol or AHCP.
>

I assume in your model, hosts on the various subnets will then have access
to a centralized DHCPv6 server and other hosts can still use SLACC (which
is connected to ::/64s on the local attached router's interface).  Would
the internal routers also get the ::/64 prefixes from the central DHCPv6
server (assume so)?  If yes, would they grab a PD (with hint) for a range
large enough to cover all of its' interfaces?

regards,

Victor K




>
> Simon.
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/homenet<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>
>
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to