On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> Sigh. >> > > Sigh all you like, but I share Dave's skepticism that ISP's renumbering my > prefix willy-nilly and it just sort of works with naming -- including > addresses squirrelled away in places they ought not be -- is going to work > any time soon. That's why we have ULAs and multiple prefixes. I don't like to think that NAT is inevitable but frankly the people in this > working group don't get to vote on that. > Actually they do. They have the freedom to specify alternatives, and depending on how good a job they do, implementers may choose to use them. > Speaking to the title of this thread: has anybody actually demonstrated > such a thing end to end? It strikes me as Frankensteinian when you get all > of the body parts bolted together. > What thing exactly? Multiprefix multihoming? End-to-end connectivity in general?
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
