On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenb...@iki.fi>wrote:
> On 8.5.2013, at 12.20, Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote: > > On 08.05.2013 11:07, Dave Taht wrote: > >> Unless you wish to maintain these modifications forever, it is helpful > >> to seek consensus with the mainline developers of these tools to push > >> your patches in a mutually acceptible form. I would suspect that dnsmasq > >> and odhcp6c devs would be amiable to a discussion at the very least. > > Speaking for odhcp6c I have looked into the homenet changes yesterday > and I don't see it as a big hassle to merge these features into the main > branch at some point once they have an official IANA number and the specs > are somewhat stable. > > > > Also feel free to contact me if you are thinking about getting anything > IPv6-related upstream to OpenWrt and we can discuss that or you can of > course also use the official channels, mailing lists and so on. > > That's underlying problem with both dnsmasq and odhcp6c forked changes - > we use IOS-specific prefix class option # that is NOT from IANA, and I'd > rather not see it in wide use for obvious reasons. > I have few problems with IOS setting a default standard, open source following it, and the IANA blessing it later. :) That said, what is the status of the IANA application? Link? -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
