>> All I know is that if we want to define a mechanism, then the mechanism >> should be compatible with the worldview of HNCP, which includes things >> such as multiple internal links and multiple CPEs.
> The mechanism should not be tied to the particular ISPs either, except > perhaps optionally. Uh-huh. Oh, and lest I forget: HNCP does not require stateful DHCPv6 for end nodes. It would be cool if the dynamic DNS mechanism didn't require it either. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
