On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:54 AM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Steven Barth <cy...@openwrt.org> wrote: >> That was not my point. I'm totally happy with having a standardized way of >> doing this but I don't think that HNCP is the place where it should be >> defined since we will probably not be the only user. > > HNCP won't be the only user, but given that it's how the network figures > itself out, it's really hard to imagine any other place where the process of > arriving at mutual trust could happen.
How could it happen? Mark > If it's not in HNCP, it's going to be in a different protocol that looks a > lot like HNCP, and runs alongside it, sharing a lot of the same per-device > state. > > _______________________________________________ > homenet mailing list > homenet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
