On 10/4/14, 10:16 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 05/10/2014 09:24, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> Right - but we still have to agree on the admin or, as you put it, >> ownership model. At least one of the proposal for autonomic networking >>is >> a centralized approach as opposed to configuring a single authentication >> password on each new device (as one with do with a WiFi network). > >Let me check that I understand. Are you saying that there are two basic >models for enrollment? > >1. "Hello, I am Brian. Please enrol me; the shared secret is *!&$£@." > >2. "Hello, I am Brian. My public key is 12345, and should already >be in your list. [Signed with my private key.]" That¹s basically the trade-off although there are many variations of #2. Here is one example: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-pritikin-bootstrapping-keyinfrastructures-01.t xt The question is what are we willing to accept in the homenet in terms of both device configuration and device requirements. Thanks, Acee > > Brian > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
