On 08/27/2015 01:43 PM, Markus Stenberg wrote:
UI isn’t what we define here. ’structural support’ = ?. How does that map to an
IETF standard? And is it something we should standardize here, and if not,
where should it be?
You dismissed any solution that requires any host changes as "out of
scope". I call bs: host naming is traditionally within
the purview of hosts, and it shouldn't be surprising that host software
will need to change to support homenet naming.
That's to be expected. It's a Good Thing.
The current state of naming on the usual suspect OS's is infantile. That
I can apt-get avahi, or type Bonjour into a search
window and wonder what I'm supposed to do with it proves exactly
nothing. Things are going to need to be a lot more
integrated into host software before any of this is useful or ordinary.
So your proposition that we can't change anything on
hosts is preposterous on its face.
Mike
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
