Hi Lizhong, Thank you very much for doing this review on such short notice.
I have updated my ballot to request that the draft include a section about considerations for selecting a hash function and the bits to use - so as to make the probability of a network hash or node hash collision low enough to be acceptable. Thanks, Alia On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Lizhong Jin <lizho....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. > The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related > drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes > on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to > the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please > see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir > > Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it > would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last > Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through > discussion or by updating the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11 > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-name-version>.txt > Reviewer: Lizhong Jin > Review Date: Oct, 21st > IETF LC End Date: > Intended Status: Standards Track > > *Summary:* > I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be > resolved before publication. > > *Comments:* > > - This draft provides an abstraction protocol specification, instead > of defining a real protocol. If authors could provide a realistic > standardized protocol based on this draft, that would be more convincing. > - My biggest concern of this draft is the hash based network state > update. The draft does not describe the case of hash collision. If the hash > collision happens, then the network state will fail to update, which will > be a severe problem. Although it maybe low probability of hash collision if > we have longer hash length, but the question is, does the network could > accept one collision? > > *Nits:* > > - Some acronyms need to expand when first use, e.g., A_NC_I, CA, SHSP. > > > Regards > Lizhong > >
_______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
