Ted Lemon <mailto:mel...@fugue.com>
14 May 2016 15:18
The only problem with that is that in the homenet ideally we'd like to have local names signed and validatable via DNSSEC, and that requires that the local namespace be global in scope, even if the names published in that namespace are not.

Not necessarily.

You only need global scope namespace if trust also needs to extend beyond Homenet.

If we're assuming that ULA will be used for on-Homenet communication streams (in the event of non-availability of GUA/ ISP uplink), then tying local names into the upstream global namespace is not strictly necessary.

So IMHO it would be just as acceptable to sign RRs for local names related to ULA address space with a locally-generated trust anchor (independent of the trust anchors installed on the Internet root servers).

Nodes and new routers would have to learn their local trust-anchor when connecting to the Homenet for the first time.

In other words, the local DNSSEC trust anchor identifies a Homenet. Not the ULA. Not an arbitrary label.

Otherwise we're going to need a globally-unique time-invariant label to identify this Homenet, that is also not based on the actual chosen ULA in use, which is not easy to generate.


Ray Hunter (v6ops) <mailto:v6...@globis.net>
14 May 2016 14:51


Ted Lemon wrote:

If devices publish keys, then you can use those keys to make sure you are still talking to them. And the dnssec validation of local names would also work. Graceful renumbering should indeed result in DNS updates. Bear in mind that this is graceful, so the old and new ULAs coexist for a while.


Sounds good.

So can we assume

1) a single ULA namespace for resolving all active ULAs, that will eventually converge to only containing RRs from a single ULA?

2) And that ULA namespace is disjoint from/completely independent of any GUA namespace?



--
regards,
RayH
<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to