> On Mar 24, 2017, at 3:04 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> wrote: > > > Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Ted - has the operation of .homenet, as described in >>> draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03, been demonstrated? > >> Specifically, has the ability to validate queries to .homenet been >> demonstrated with a simulated root zone including the entry for >> .homenet, properly configured recursive resolvers and properly >> configured clients (having received a list of the local recursive >> resolvers through DHCP or ND)? > > Are you asking this is in the context of a recursive resolver that speaks > homenet (mDNS, etc.), or one that has no knowledge of .homenet.?
It would be interesting to test both scenarios - the former scenario will test whether the mechanism in homenet-dot works in practice and the latter will give some indication of how queries in the .homenet zone will be handled (e.g., leakage to root servers) in non-homenet networks. > I note in the IANA considerations that the root will have an insecure > delegation to a blackhole server. So I think the simulation above would > need to do that as well. Yes. - Ralph > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > > _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
