Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> writes: > I've updated the document to separate this out into three lettered > subheads. We can't change the numbering, because that's required by > RFC 6761, but I agree that it's clearer if the three separate topics > are split out.
I hadn't realized from the draft that the items in section 4 are meant to parallel the items in section 5 of RFC 6761, since the connecting text is only "(as per [RFC 6761])". Perhaps it would help to amplify that to "(per the template in [RFC 6761] section 5)". Dale _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet