Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> writes:
> I've updated the document to separate this out into three lettered
> subheads.   We can't change the numbering, because that's required by
> RFC 6761, but I agree that it's clearer if the three separate topics
> are split out.

I hadn't realized from the draft that the items in section 4 are meant
to parallel the items in section 5 of RFC 6761, since the connecting
text is only "(as per [RFC 6761])".  Perhaps it would help to amplify
that to "(per the template in [RFC 6761] section 5)".

Dale

_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

Reply via email to