It all depends how you see mastery:

is it real mastery ? 
or is it mastery in the view of the player or his/her friends & family ?
is it mastery in the view of audition juries ?

it depends also
if you are ready for a certain position & the position is right then vacant ?
are there better candidates ?

is there discrimination against you from conductors side due to a personal
incident during study time perhaps ?

did you have difficulties with one of the section members in the past ?
does your tonal colour match the section ?

do you fit into their social preview ? (age pyramide, a very important factor)

too many factors counting.

playing wise, well, it is lie the olympics. Favorites sometimes win, 
sometimes dont get a medal at all.

Life is life.

#################################################################

Am 18.03.2010 um 09:34 schrieb [email protected]:

> Plus mastery of an instrument doesn't yield a fruitful career.
> 
> Although the rate of mastery of a task versus success in a career is much  
> higher outside of the field of music.
> 
> -William
> 
> 
> In a message dated 3/18/2010 4:30:02 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> [email protected] writes:
> 
> It is  not important, how many hours one studies one thing. 
> But it is very  important how effectively practice time is used. 
> One first has to learn  & understand how music is about, including the 
> theory. 
> Next one has to  learn & understand 
> how practice time is to be divided for the certain  purposes: 
> 
> developing the hearing sense
> developing technical skill  including secureness,
> developing tone quality,
> developing  endurance,
> developing musical taste through musical literature, means  
> developing musical knowledge
> developing the ability to read, understand  & play music at the spot, 
> even never seen the part before & never  heard the piece before.
> 
> If the time is divided properly and if practice  is done with most possible 
> concentration upon the matter,
> one should be  able to study the horn or trumpet or any other brass 
> instrument to arrive  at
> a high professional level, just with three hours studying daily for five  
> to six years.
> 300 days a year (vacations & days without the horn, ill  leave etc. 
> counted) by
> three hours daily makes 900 to 1000 hours (gigs  count also positively), 
> that by 5 years makes 4.500 hours, 
> by seven years  6.300 hours. Count the extra hours of preparation by just 
> reading the musical  literature, 
> preparing parts, writing out parts by hand or PC, hours spent  in the 
> library, fixing the horn, well, 
> there you have the 10.000  hours.
> 
> Be happy you have not to study as much as string players or wood  wind 
> players, who have to spend
> uncountable hours preparing their reeds,  not to speak about pianists.
> 
> If one does not consider the points I  mentioned above, one has the never 
> ending problem, needing
> to "hammer in"  every single part, just mechanical trying & trying & trying 
> again.  What a waste of life time.
> If you study, using your brain, your advancement  will be much faster and 
> you will have remaining tie to 
> rest, for sports,  for socializing, etc.
> 
> Do not forget studying art history in general,  try to study Italian & 
> rudimentary German to understand
> the masterworks  better. If you have a very good teacher, NEVER question 
> his advice. But if you  
> might find a better solution or a better trick, making a passage easier,  
> demonstrate it to your
> teacher, who will like your effort. But, again,  never question your 
> teacher  !!
> 
> ############################################################################
> ###########
> Am  18.03.2010 um 06:03 schrieb Kit Wolf:
> 
>> I've heard this too, though  I feel slightly uncertain about the idea of 
> it
>> being a hard and fast  rule.
>> 
>> I guess there are two points here: one is how much  practice an 'average'
>> person has done. Almost by definition, a master  is somebody who is
>> exceptional and to my mind the 10,000 hour rule  simply reflects the fact
>> that most amateur musicians never put in this  many hours - or at least,
>> not within a short period of time.
>> 
>> The other is how long it takes to reach a steady state of  accomplishment,
>> where a level of diminishing returns is reached.  Surely this must vary 
> for
>> different endeavours? It takes less time to  play noughts and crosses to 
> an
>> excellent standard than chess, for  example. I also once read that airtime
>> stopped being a good marker of  pilot ability after the 250 - 1000 hour
>> mark.
>> 
>> I don't  find it hard to believe it takes 10,000 hours to play the horn
>> well,  though. Perhaps more..?
>> 
>> Kit
>> 
>>> That's  interesting. Too bad I'm pretty sure I practiced the horn for
>>> 10,000 hours (took it 40 years ago) but I'm not close to achieving
>>> "true mastery" :-(
>>> 
>>> Daniel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 17Mar 2010, at 14:54 , Steven Mumford wrote:
>>> 
>>>> One of the most significant factors is what scientists call  the
>>>> "10,000-hour rule."
>>>> When we look at any  kind of cognitively complex field -- for example,
>>>> playing  chess, writing fiction or being a neurosurgeon -- we find that
>>>> you are unlikely to master it unless you have practiced for  10,000
>>>> hours. That’s 20 hours a week for 10 years. The brain  takes that
>>>> long to
>>>> assimilate all it needs to  know to achieve true mastery.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> post:  [email protected]
>>> unsubscribe or set options at
>>> 
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/c.j.l.wolf%40newcastle.ac.uk
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sometimes my Email program gives the  wrong return address. If you have 
> any
>> trouble replying to me, use  '[email protected]' and not 
> 'n802...'
>> 
>> Sorry for any  confusion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> post:  [email protected]
>> unsubscribe or set options at  
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> post:  [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at  
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> post: [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at 
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to