Maybe it`s a chance for the horn player to play a few notes that aren`t so  
exposed after counting all those measures. A nice little warm up?
 
 
In a message dated 12/7/2010 1:18:31 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

I know I  only have a bachelor's degree in Music, but I did fairly well in  
my  theory and analysis classes so I'm wondering if I'm correct or wrong in 
 
this  assumption:

When auditions call for the exposition only  for a Mozart concerto, it's  
fairly easy to determine what they mean  with the 1st and 2nd concertos. 
However  with the 3rd concerto, I was  always unsure about playing the very 
short 
segment  of the  introduction which is present in at least the Schirmer 
editions, and  so  the last few times I played it on a recital I only 
started  
playing at what was  obviously the exposition (introduction of the  theme) 
and let 
the piano or  whoever play the full introduction. I  could have been wrong, 
but it was just  something I felt was a better  way to perform it - why 
give 
away the show before  the theme starts?  Most concerti in the classical 
period don't let the soloist  play  until the introduction of the theme and 
maybe 
it was some joke  by  Mozart so that the performer could make sure the 
right 
crook was  in?  Or maybe the act of buzzing a few very quiet notes on the 
horn before  you  actually play is something Mozart noticed only horn 
players  
doing and wanted to  make it part of the concerto? Either way, maybe  I'm 
crazy, but it just seems odd  for it to be written that  way.

Of course, for the 4th concerto, the introduction is the longest  and the  
horn passage in the introduction of the first movement at  least to me 
sticks 
out  like a sore thumb. So, why is it in there? To  me, the theme and 
exposition  doesn't start until the horn player  plays the Bb arpeggio on 
whole 
notes, so why  not just omit that  section for performances and auditions? 
You're 
in unison with  the  violins or piano anyway.

I'm not a historian, and I don't want to start  some huge argument. I could 
 
be completely wrong about my ideas, but  maybe I'm not the only one who saw 
the  introduction passages for the  Horn as out of place? Is this an 
incorrect   assumption?

-William


_______________________________________________
post:  [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/weshatch%40aol.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to