Fingerings could be worse - and there are always alternatives and things  
you can do to alleviate the problem (including practice). But those that 
don't  wish to play the piece in E - do they ask the entire orchestra to 
transpose  so they don't have to deal with E parts in Brahms 4?
 
-William
 
 
In a message dated 3/14/2011 9:32:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Birdalone produced a facsimile of the old print. I own the old  print. By 
the way,
I provided them with the third part of the Dauprat Horn  methode, which 
they produced
as a big folio format volume with all 3 parts,  a wonderful new edition, 
including the
English translation.

yes,  William, the Krufft Sonata sounds better in E, but the notoric  
B-flat-players
fear to break their fingers when playing in E. Hahaha ! If  one has studied 
violin,
this is no problem. If one places the fingers on  the keys like wurstel, 
the problems
are perfect as they are when throwing  the fingers up or spreading them in 
the  air.

###################################################################
Am  14.03.2011 um 14:00 schrieb [email protected]:

> Birdalone in the US  (I think) published an E version, but the piano part 
 
> did not  have the Horn accompaniment. I prefer it in E. To me it just 
sounds   
> better. Maybe I have synthesesia, but certain keys have different  
'flavors' 
> for  me. 
> 
> -William
> 
>  
> In a message dated 3/14/2011 8:38:34 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time,  
> [email protected] writes:
> 
> Yes, it  is.  I have rewritten it to my iMAC & have two versions now 
ready, 
> in  F or  in E-flat. 
> Could also make it in E, the original tonality,  but this is  published 
by 
> Billaudot in
> Paris, I guess. I  have the two versions ready  now.
> 
>  ####################################################################
>  Am  14.03.2011 um 13:25 schrieb [email protected]:
> 
>>  This reminds me of  the Krufft Sonata. In some ways the piano part is  
> just  
>> as  difficult as the Beethoven. At  least, as I've been told by 
pianists. 
>> 
>>  -William
>> 
>> 
>> In a message dated  3/14/2011  6:43:42 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
>>  [email protected]  writes:
>> 
>> Thanks,   interesting reading on this cursed  day.  (If you are outside  
> the  
>> US,
>> it's the first  work day  of Day Light Savings Time.  So instead of  
> getting  
>> up
>> at 5 AM, it's 4 AM masquerading as 5 AM by act  of   Congress.)  
>> 
>> -----Original  Message-----
>> From:  [email protected]  [mailto:[email protected]] On  
> Behalf
>>  Of  Gary Greene
>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 9:07   PM
>> To:  Horn-List
>> Subject: [Hornlist]  Accompanied  Sonatas
>> 
>> 
>> On 13  March  2011,  [email protected] wrote regarding the 
>  Beethoven
>> Sonata "I  had  always assumed that this work  was for solo horn with 
piano
>> accompaniment. I  was listening  to it yesterday and recalled what Hans  
> has
>> said  about the  Mozart work for string and horn, the horn was  part of  
the
>> ensemble.   Is that the case the Beethoven  that  it is a work as much 
for
>> piano as it is  for  horn?"
>> 
>> The Beethoven sonata, along with his sonatas  for cello/piano   and
>> violin/piano are part of the last  gasp of a tradition sometimes  called 
 
> the
>>  "accompanied keyboard sonata."  In the middle of  the 18th  century,  
> keyboard
>> sonatas were often given an   "obligato" instrument which  accompanied 
the
>> keyboard.   That  is, these were, as Hans points out by  given us the 
>  original
>> title of the Beethoven horn sonata, keyboard  sonatas  accompanied by  
> another
>> instrument and  not sonatas for a solo instrument   accompanied by the 
>>  keyboard
>> (which is how we conceptualize  them   today).  These were different 
from a
>> parallel  tradition  that involved  a solo instrument accompanied by  
>  keyboard,
>> in which latter case the  keyboard part was  often  simply a 
thoroughbass 
> line
>> that the  keyboardist was  expected to  realize.  Two different views of 
 a
>> sonata involving   keyboard and solo instrument  existing side by side 
in 
> the
>> 18th    century.
>> 
>> Having said that, let me add the  expected  musicological  waffling!  :-)
>>  
>> 1.  That a work  might be entitled something  like  "sonata for piano 
with 
>> horn
>> accompaniment" does not  mean that the  piano part could be  played 
minus 
>  the
>> horn as a solo sonata.  The horn  part is   obbligato (obligatory).
>> 2.  "Accompaniment" did not  then  carry  the negative weight of being a 
>>  lesser
>> or merely  supporting role.  The  term would  have suggested a
>> partnership--chamber music.
>>  3.   Performers today playing  such sonatas therefore should  not 
relegate
>> their  keyboard  players to the background  reflexively; it's a joint 
> effort.
>> So,    [email protected], the answer to your question is "yes."
>>  4.   But in some cases, the musical content DOES indicate  a   
subordinate
>> relationship of one performer in favor  of another,  so...it's  not a 
joint
>> effort.
>>  
>> So be aware of  these traditions but also look at  the  music to see if 
the
>> composer is communicating a partnership or a  lead  actor with a  
> supporting
>> player...and be  aware that the supporting player is   not necessarily  
the
>> keyboard.
>> 
>> One other lesson   here:  all of  this points up the need to know what 
the
>>  composer wrote.  We usually  think of this in terms of pitches  and  
> rhythms,
>> but what a composer calls a   piece is very often a clue  to his intent. 
 
> An
>>  18th-century sinfonie  concertante and a  concerto for multiple  
> instruments
>> might strike us today  as  seeming  like pretty much the same thing, but 
a
>> composer then was   likely  thinking of two different kinds of things 
when 
>  he
>> labeled  the pieces as two  different genres.   Same way when Wagner has 
 
> an
>> oveture for Rienzi  but  a prelude for Lohengrin--both are  instrumental 
>>  pieces
>> that open operas, but  the terms  overture and  prelude signal  different
>> conceptualizations.
>>  
>> Hope these comments are   helpful.
>>  
>> Gary Greene, Ph.D.
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>> post:    [email protected]
>> unsubscribe or set options  at
>>  
>  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/bgross%40airmail.ne
>>  t
>> 
>>  _______________________________________________
>> post:   [email protected]
>> unsubscribe or set options at    
>> 
>  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>>  post:  [email protected]
>> unsubscribe or set options at   
>  https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com
>  
> _______________________________________________
> post:   [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at  
>  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com
>  
> _______________________________________________
> post:  [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com

_______________________________________________
post:  [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at  
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/valkhorn%40aol.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to