If audiences have nothing more to do than to examine dresses of performers or 
how much spit is dropped from the the instruments - measured in pints or liters 
does not matter - , there could be several reasons:

bad or boring pieces, bad or boring performance or 

a stupid, uneducated, unexperienced, antimusical audience.

But, here it comes:

there are several ways of "watering":

the careless way as in the concert mentioned by Valerie
or the careful discrete way, which is fast & nearly not noticeable.
Well, over excited players can develop a higher body temperature than
average, heating up their breath temperature, resulting in a lot of 
condensate in the instrument if the room temperature is quite low.
But I think the room would be rather overheated in your country than cold.

The decent & discrete way emptying the horn should not be that difficult,
special with the water key. But we have to admit, that we have a lot of 
colleagues 
who do not care a dime about the audience, not regarding water emptying
only, but regarding seating, attitudes, dressing, clean appearance (well shaved,
"buttons locked, zipper locked" - hoho !) .. etc. ............  

Some might argument what that had to do with a concert. Well, it has to do
with selling the concert to the audience. And I have to agree with Valerie, 
that a concert is an audio-visual thing, not  just to listen to. 

###################################################################
Am 16.03.2011 um 04:07 schrieb dabon west:

> 
> Which confirms my view that audiences sometimes "hear" better with their eyes 
> than they do with their ears.  The corollary being that a musical ensemble 
> (or another performance group for that matter) dressed in a formal concert 
> attire will sound  "better" than those dressed in "come as you are" garb.  A 
> matter of visual perception, not aural.  Thus, the reason for blind auditions 
> behind screens perhaps.  As a side note:  this is possibly the reason the 
> older churches where the organ is situated in the loft UP and BEHIND the 
> congregation in which meditation and the accompanying prelude (etal.)  music 
> is supposed to have a religious effect.  No so in my church, unfortunately, 
> where everyone (or nearly most anyway) blab away in spite of the organist's 
> efforts.  Incidental music as it were.  Apparently "incidental music" is also 
> the view of the good lady doctor at the concert she attended where "water", 
> as a by-product of performance, had more of her attention (vision) than wha
 t 
> she heard.  Maybe she would have had a better experience if the group had 
> played like blind auditioners:  only silhouettes behind a stage drop; ergo no 
> spit seen.  In the final analysis, no matter just how PC performers are, 
> there is always someone who is distracted by the mundane.
> DW
> 
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:25:19 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [Hornlist] Water
>> 
>> Spit happens !   Deal with it.
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "valerie wells" <[email protected]>
>> To: "horn list 2 memphis" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Hornlist] Water
>> 
>> 
>>> Jeff Nelsen from the Canadian Brass has shared his evaluation:
>>> http://www.thejoykey.com/en/testimonials/#nelsen
>>> 
>>> My doctor attended a concert presented by a well known brass quintet (not
>>> CB).  The next time I saw her, I asked her how she enjoyed the concert. 
>>> She
>>> told me that honestly it was very difficult to enjoy the performance 
>>> because
>>> she was so grossed out by all the spit being emptied on the stage.
> 
>                                         
> _______________________________________________
> post: [email protected]
> unsubscribe or set options at 
> https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/hpizka%40me.com

_______________________________________________
post: [email protected]
unsubscribe or set options at 
https://pegasus.memphis.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/options/horn/archive%40jab.org

Reply via email to